SEN- the postcode lottery and transition to EHCP

It’s not just Autism services, but all special educational needs.

Recently there has been lots of talk about statutory assessments and the fact that so many parents requests have been refused, in one area ALL parent requests were denied by the LEA.

Where we live, it seems to be that refusal to assess is purely a way to extend the timescales for assessment.

When I went through the process with Dinky she was not only granted a statement of educational needs, but she has been awarded a substantial education package. 1:1 support at all times in an out of county independent special school placement, with daily OT, weekly SaLT, and weekly dog therapy, which requires a taxi and escort for 2 x 45 minute journeys a day.

It is baffling to think that at the start of the process they refused to assess and wrote

Dinky’s educational needs can currently continue to be met within the resources available through school action plus

This was written with no actual assessments to back up their decision, and was proven beyond a doubt to be completely untrue! I always shudder at the idea of someone being in the same predicament and believing that the LEA made an informed decision and the parent decides to leave it. My advice to anyone being refused a statutory assessment is to appeal. The latest figures show that of those who appealed 84% were granted a statutory assessment!

Luckily I was warned that our local authority tend to refuse to assess, and that I should appeal. True to what I was told a meeting with the LEA led to them rolling over and allowing the assessment to go ahead.

Now Dinky’s statement is nearly a year old, and as she is in year 2, her statement is one of the thousands that are going to be transferred over to EHCP this academic year.

I’ve known this for a while as I checked the dates for her year on the local offer website (which is a pain to navigate and not very informative in some areas).

This weekend in the post we recieved Dinky’s Annual Review date. (Put aside the fact she has only been in a placement for 2 months). I believed this AR was supposed to be a transition meeting for EHCP. So today I phoned Dinky’s caseworker from the SEN team at the LEA.

I told her that I’d recieved a date for AR from the school but as Dinky is in year 2, I was under the impression that this was supposed to be the year she transfers and that maybe I had got it wrong. (I’ve found that if you tell them they are wrong from the off- they get a tad touchy).

Well, I can only tell you that I wasn’t that reassured when, the caseworker said:

Oh, I don’t know how it works with annual review and transition, this is all new. I’ll speak to my collegue and get back to you… Hold on.

Now, just to clear up for those that don’t know, the education reforms came into effect 1st September 2014, which is over 6 months ago and as a pathfinder county it’s not like they were unaware these changes were coming in. So this lack of knowledge about how it works from those inside the LEA is astounding. Especially when parents are going to training from the local parent carer forum and so far seem to be more knowledgable than the people who are supposed to be helping our children et the support they need in this process. (Although writing that doesn’t seem much different to doctors not knowing what PDA is or diagnosticians saying a child can’t be autistic because they happened to give momentary eye contact!)

She got back on the phone and said I was right (should have got that in writing!), that this annual review is supposed to be a transition meeting and that the school need to download the parent carer booklet and send it to me to fill in for the review date so that they can transfer the statement to EHCP.

She then said that no one fom the county will attend the meeting. However she will get someone to tell the school that this review will be transition, and make sure the process is adhered to.

I asked if I could download the booklet, and was told that that would probably be a good idea!

So it seems that the SEN system is still in crisis. The main issue here is that the people this affects are one of the most vulnerable groups of people in our society- children with SEND. Furthermore, already stressed out parents dealing with being a carer of a child with special needs, are having to become the experts and do all the work in order to make sure their children get the support they need.

Advertisements

2 thoughts on “SEN- the postcode lottery and transition to EHCP

  1. Fairly similar story in our county (also a Pathfinder). I think part of the problem is that they were trained early on, and the goalposts were in no way fixed at that point, so they’ve had many changes since to deal with…. but then again, that is their job… am shocked that they can say they won’t come to your EHCP Transfer review – I’d be feeding that back to the local parent carer forum and also directly to Mr.Timpson!

    • Like you say, it’s their job to know this stuff. Where I used to work (before the days of being Dinky’s very own personal assistant and general dogsbody), we had new things to learn about the advancement of the technology used in our products every 3-6 months. We had to do this on our time and complete online training and tests to prove we had done it.
      This is one massive document change but if the parents get it, there is no excuse for the SEN teams within the LEA not to get it. We have to learn lots of things to do with health, education and social care, so far they only have to learn about education and slot the bits in the other services give them, and it’s not even like the SEN caseworkers seem to actually do anything other than field calls and chase things up, they don’t write EHCPs, so they should at least know their part in the process. As, like I said, parents seem to know the whole process.
      It’s lazy and wrong, and I don’t see any co-production. I just see a more detailed booklet I have to fill in, I have to work out which targets and what the future needs to look like for Dinky, and then it gets added as an appendix, maybe mis-quoted and completely misunderstood parts end up in the actual plan itself….
      I don’t see the major difference to a statement. Health still won’t turn up either, and social care is very hard to get for any child with an IQ over 70 in our area. (Although we have a good short breaks provision which suits most of those who don’t meet CDT criteria).

      It’s rather deflating when the actual idea of the EHCP sounded promising. Co-production… I don’t think so.

Add your comment here...

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s